16 กรกฎาคม 2552
0) IFA's Opinion regarding the connected transaction of TTW
the MLR at 7.30% per annum, which is calculated based on the MLR for the
previous 10 years of
commercial banks in the country (source: Bank of Thailand).
Summary Table of Projected Cost and Expenses
Unit : Bt. Million 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-2039
1) cost of Sales - Tap Water
3.49 1/
- Variable Cost 11.18 12.03 13.20 16.53
17.49 18.50 19.63 20.71 21.91 23.19 23.95 -
40.66
2.56 1/
- Fixed Cost 8.04 8.41 8.80 9.23
11.67 10.10 10.57 11.06 11.57 14.45 12.67 -
29.35
Page 65 of the total 92 pages
The
Opinion Report of the Independent Financial Advisor
Unit : Bt. Million 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-2039
2) Cost of waste water
treatment service
2.62 1/
- Variable Cost 8.46 9.11 10.00 11.82
12.52 13.27 14.10 14.90 15.79 16.73 17.28-
29.34
2.04 1/
- Fixed Cost 6.41 6.70 7.01 7.38
10.71 8.06 8.43 8.82 9.22 13.13 10.08 -
24.50
11.08 1/ 34.78 36.35 38.66
3) Selling and Administration 46.33
47.66 49.04 50.58 51.92 53.43 55.00 55.39-
Expenses
62.73
24.33 1/ 87.60 94.90 85.98
4) Financial Expense 75.23
64.48 53.74 42.99 32.24 21.49 10.75 -
Note: 1/ Actual expense for 4 months (Sep. - Dec. 2009)
6. Corporate income tax
The Company was listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand in 2008 and has
been eligible for corporate
income tax reduction to 25% of net profit for a 3-year period during
2009-2011. However, in the projection,
such tax privilege will not be included in the calculation, although the
Company will get the operating rights
to manage the facility and recognize the income from which in its operating
results, and in order that the
real project returns can be figure out. Thus, corporate income tax of 30%
of net profit is set throughout the
projected period.
7. Additional investments
According to the technical due diligence report, additional investments for
the tap water production system
and the waste water treatment system are set at Bt. 5.074 million and Bt.
10.303 million, respectively. This
aims at improving its facilities for perfection in service and security,
such as modification of room partitions,
addition of closed-circuit TV system, improvement of water well walkway,
improvement of waste water well
and facility, and fixing of electricity system for more safety in
operations, etc. The Company has agreed to
such undertakings with investment cost set at Bt. 15.377 million in 2009,
with calculation of depreciation of
the additionally invested tap water production system and waste water
treatment system by the same
methodology for a 30-year period which is in line with the term of the
operating rights granted, i.e. variation
by production unit, in accordance with the depreciation policy for the
Company's tap water production
facility, as follows:
Depreciation for the period = Net cost of assets
additionally invested as of beginning of
period X Water production
rate for the period
Water production rate for the period = Actual water production output for
the period
(Actual water production
output for the period + Projected
water production output in
future until the end of Operating
Rights Agreement)
Net cost of assets additionally invested as of beginning of period
Page 66 of the total 92 pages
The Opinion Report of
the Independent Financial Advisor
= Total assets additionally
invested - Accumulated depreciation
up to beginning of period
8. Operating rights purchase price
Purchase price of operating rights at Bangpa-in Industrial Estate is set
at Bt. 1,400 million, divided into
three installments of payment, i.e. Bt. 1,000 million, Bt. 200 million
and Bt. 200 million during 2009-2011
respectively. This is in line with the term of payment prescribed in the
Operating Rights Agreement. The
payment is set to be amortized for a 30-years period on the basis of
variation by production unit as in the
case of depreciation of additional investments.
9. Working capital
Average collection period: 32 days
Average payment period: 17 days
The projected working capital is based on the Company's actual data in 2008.
10. The Discount rate
The discount rate used for calculation of present value of discounted cash
flow is derived from the cost of
capital (Ke), which is 11.20%.
The Indpendent Financial Advisor has adopted the Capital Asset Pricing
Model (CAPM) in the calculation
of Ke, using the following formula:
Ke = Rf + ? * (Rm - Rf)
Whereas
Risk Free Rate (Rf) = 5.43% based on the 28-year government
bond yield (data as of May 28,
2009 from www.thaibma.or.th).
Market Return (Rm) = 11.91% as derived from the average
return on investments in the SET
for the past 30 years, which is in
line with the term of the Operating
Rights Agreement, up to May 28, 2009.
Beta (?) = Beta based on the volatility of the
daily return on the SET to the closing
price of ordinary shares of reference
companies as detailed below:
(1) Calculation of average unleveraged Beta of reference companies
CGS, the IFA, view that the Company and PTW have made a minimum
off-take quantity guarantee of
treated water sales and have had clear determination of selling prices of
water from PWA throughout the
contractual period. Thus, the Company's Beta may not reflect the risk
relative to the purchase of Operating
Rights. Meantime, EASTW which operates the same type of business as the
Company's has recorded very
low share trading liquidity on the SET for the previous one year, i.e.
trading of around 0.02% of its total
issued shares. It may not be a proper reference company for the
calculation. For additional disclosure to
Page 67 of the total 92 pages
The Opinion
Report of the Independent Financial Advisor
the Shareholders of the Company, if Leverage Beta of the Company and EASTW
which are 0.36 times and
0.42 times, respectively are used in calculation with the debt to equity ratio
of 1.21 times and 0.54 times
respectively, the return on shareholder equity (Ke) would be 7.76% and 8.15%,
respectively.
The Indpendent Financial Advisor has accordingly figure out Beta of
reference companies out of all the
listed companies in the energy & utilities sector on the SET, which the
Independent Financial Advisor has
the Opinion that it should well reflect the risk or sensitivity of the
investment in the Operating Rights to a
certain extent since the reference companies have to make a large investment
to operate their business in
energy and utilities sector at the different level of risk and each project
needs a length of time to operate
the business in order to generage the return on investment.
The average unleveraged Beta may be figured out from the average equity
raw Beta of the reference
companies, i.e. all listed companies in the energy & utilities sector on the
SET, with the adjustment of
leveraged Beta with debt to equity (D/E) ratio and corporate income tax, as in
the following formula:
Unleveraged Beta (?U) Leveraged Beta (?L) / (1 + ((1 -
tax rate) * D/E ratio))
=
Company Tax D/E Ratio Lev. BETA Unlev. BETA
1 BANPU 30% 0.86 1.505 0.939
BCP 30% 1.34 0.796 0.411
2
3 EASTW 30% 0.54 0.422 0.306
EGCO 30% 0.27 0.435 0.366
4
GLOW 30% 1.44 0.535 0.266
5
IRPC 30% 0.51 1.222 0.901
6
LANNA 30% 0.41 1.161 0.902
7
PTT 30% 1.30 1.415 0.741
8
PTTAR 30% 1.73 1.483 0.671
9
10 PTTEP 30% 1.17 1.483 0.815
11 RATCH 30% 0.70 0.450 0.302
12 TOP 30% 1.22 1.394 0.752
13 TTW 30% 1.21 0.357 0.193
14 AI 30% 0.70 0.470 0.315
15 AKR 30% 1.47 0.405 0.200
16 BAFS 30% 1.33 0.258 0.134
17 ESSO 30% 1.61 0.992 0.466
18 MDX 30% 2.32 1.152 0.439
19 RPC 30% 3.00 0.576 0.186
20 SCG 30% 1.46 0.145 0.072
21 SGP 30% 1.01 0.862 0.505
22 SOLAR 30% 0.14 1.152 1.049
23 SUSCO 30% 0.42 0.870 0.672
24 TCC 30% 0.10 0.567 0.530
1.09 0.506
Average
Source : Bloomberg for the previous 1 year up to May 28, 2009 (1 day before
the date of resolution for the purchase of Operating Rights)
Page 68 of the total 92 pages
The Opinion Report
of the Independent Financial Advisor
(2) Calculation of average leveraged Beta of the Company
Average leveraged Beta can be figured out by treating the
average unleveraged Beta calculated in (1)
above at 0.506 with the following formula:
Leveraged Beta (?L) = Unleveraged Beta (?U) * (1 + ((1
- tax rate) * D/E ratio))
From the above calculation, leveraged Beta is worked out from
the adjustment of the average
unleveraged Beta with the Company's corporate income tax at 30% of
pre-tax profit and average D/E ratio
of reference companies at 1.09. The outcome leveraged Beta is 0.89.
Such average leveraged Beta will
be used by the IFA for calculation of cost of equity (Ke) here:
Ke = 5.43% + 0.89 * (11.91% - 5.43%)
= 11.20%
From the above assumption and the discount rate, the rate of return
on the project is 12.80% and the net
present value of discounted free cash flow is positive Bt. 76.80 million. This
indicates that the purchase of the
Operating Rights will yield higher amount of return than the investment amount
by approximately Bt. 76.80 million.
The details are given in Appendix 4.
Moreover, the Indpendent Financial Advisor has conducted a
sensitivity analysis of the projected cash
inflow employing the discount rate in the range of 10.20%-12.20%. The outcome
of net present value of discounted
free cash flow will be as follows:
The Discount rate (%) Net present value of discounted free
cash flow
(Bt. million)
10.20 139.60
11.20* 76.80
12.20 25.75
Note: * The Discount rate for the base case
With the discount rate range of 10.20% - 12.20%, net present value of
discount free cash flow will come out
higher than zero, i.e. ranging from Bt. 25.75 million to Bt. 139.60 million,
representing higher return than investment
cost. Thus, the Indpendent Financial Advisor has the Opinion that the purchase
price of the Operating Rights at
Bangpa-in Industrial Estate of Bt. 1,400 million is reasonable. However, the
calculated value has not reflected the
risk mentioned in Item 2.4 - the Risk Factors to make the Transaction.
Hence, to disclouse more information to the Shareholders of the
Company, the Independent Financial
Advisor has constructed the sensitivity analysis of projected free cash flow
by changing factors affected the
performance at the increasing and decreasing rate of 1% of the assumption. It
could be divided into 3 scenarios:
Page 69 of the total 92 pages
The
Opinion Report of the Independent Financial Advisor
Case 1 The Change in growth rate of utilization of tap water by the
entrepreneurs in Bangpa-in Industrial
Estate, which would change in range of 2%-4%
Case 2 The Change in growth rate of selling price of tap water and
waste water treatment, which would
change in range of 6.5%-8.5%
Case 3 The Change in growth rate of cost of sales and expense of tap
water production and waste water
treatment service, which would change in range of 4.5%-6.5% for employee
expense, and 2%-4% for the cost and
other expenses.
From the sensitivity analysis of the above 3 scenarios at the
discount rate of 11.20%, the net present value
of free cash flow would be as follows:
Case 1
Case 2 Case 3
Change in growth rate of Change in
growth rate of selling Change in growth rate of cost and other
utilization of tap water price and
service price expenses
Unit : Bt. Million 2% 3%* 4% 6.5%
7.5%* 8.5% 4.5% and 5.5% and 6.5% and
2% 3%* 4%
Net present value of 16.15 76.80 142.39 56.48
76.80 97.49 112.45 76.80 35.43
free cashflow
Note : * Base Case
From the above sensitivity table, the growth rate of utilization of
tap water by companies in Bangpa-in
Industrial Estate would mostly effect to the performance and free cash flow.
In conclusion, if there is a decrease or
increase in 1% on the assumpti0n, the net present value would change from the
base case of Bt. 76.80 million to the
minimum value of Bt. 16.15 million and the maximum value of Bt. 142.39
million, respectively.
3.2 Appropriateness of conditions of payment for the Operating Rights
and the other conditions in the
drafted agreement of operating rights
The Independent Financial Advisor has the Opinion on conditions of
payment for the Operating Rights and
the other conditions in the drafted agreement of operating rights, which can
be summarized as follows:
Details
The IFA's Opinion
1. Conditions of payment for the Operating Rights The
Company would recive benefit from compensation of Bt.
1,400
million to BLDC, which is divided into 3 installments: The
First
Installment of Bt. 1,000 million after the date of the execution
on the
agreement, the second and last installment would be Bt.
200
million and Bt. 200 million within 365 days and 730 days after
the date
of execution on the agreement. The Company would
received
the transferred right of producing and distributing tap
water, and
the right of rendering service on waste water
treatment,
which could start operating immediately. However, 3
Page 70 of the total 92
pages
The Opinion
Report of the Independent Financial Advisor
Details
The IFA's Opinion
installment
for the right might be considered as normal condition
for
trading, which is the same as the other agreement such as the
construction agreement which the contractor would deliver the
completed
work but the hirer would deduct some portion of
payment of
approximately 10-25% of total value for guaranteed
work, and
later pay to the contractor when the agreement would
be due.
Therefore, it deems that the conditions of payment by the
Company
would provide an advantage to BLDC.
2. Purchase of the operating rights This
condition is made between the Company and BLDC, such
purchase
would not grant the title right to the Company, but it
would
return to BLDC after the expiry of the agreement. However,
the right
recived by the Company deems that the Company would
own the
assets during the determined time because the Company
can manage,
administer, and repair the assets in order to
generate
the revenue to the Company. Thus, if the Company
choose to
purchase the assets, the value of the assets might be
changed.
Furthermore, such purchase of the assets would be
rarely
happen because of the limitation of the agreement and
obligation
between BLDC and IEAT.
3. Condition of utilization of the asset for 30 years The
duration of the agreement of 30 years would be appropriate
because if
it's shorten, the Company might lose the opportunity
and could
not fully utilize the asset.
4. Condition of the minimum guarantee on quantity The
Company would receive benefit from BLDC that guarantee
the minimum
quantity of demand for tap water and waste water
treatment
for 3 years, and guarantee the commencement of the
SPP project
within 2013. Hence, the Company would receive the
compensation from BLDC if the actual operation would not be in
line with
the projected operation.
5. Condition that grant BLDC or IEAT to utilize tap water not more This
condition is made between the Company and BLDC by
than 25,000 cu.m. per annum during the agreement specifying
that utilization of tap water deems to the portion of
compensation of Bt. 1,400 million. The Company would lose
revenue by
not charging in approximately Bt. 0.56 million per
annum (at
the current rate of Bt. 22.50 per cu.m.)
6. Condition that the Company would be responsible to pay This condition is
made between the Company and BLDC, which
expense that BLDC must pay to IEAT for supervisory fee at 50% the Company
would receive benefit because the current
of the actual amount paid by BLDC supervisory
fee to IEAT was resulted from BLDC's request for the
(more)